Winter 2020 | CoDesign Collaborative https://codesigncollaborative.org A Creative Lens for Change Thu, 04 Nov 2021 21:34:32 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.1 https://codesigncollaborative.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/cropped-Website-Favicon-32x32.png Winter 2020 | CoDesign Collaborative https://codesigncollaborative.org 32 32 Design Impact Posters https://codesigncollaborative.org/issue/design-impact-posters/ Wed, 22 Jan 2020 02:04:00 +0000 http://designmuseum.wpengine.com/?post_type=issue&p=15535 The post Design Impact Posters appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>

Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /nas/content/live/designmuseum/wp-content/themes/child-theme/templates/articles.php on line 20

Notice: Trying to get property 'slug' of non-object in /nas/content/live/designmuseum/wp-content/themes/child-theme/templates/articles.php on line 20

Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /nas/content/live/designmuseum/wp-content/themes/child-theme/templates/issues.php on line 17

Notice: Trying to get property 'slug' of non-object in /nas/content/live/designmuseum/wp-content/themes/child-theme/templates/issues.php on line 17

The post Design Impact Posters appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>
Letter from the Editor https://codesigncollaborative.org/healthcare-issue-letter-from-the-editor/ Wed, 03 Nov 2021 16:01:04 +0000 https://codesignforstg.wpenginepowered.com/?p=24733 The post Letter from the Editor appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>

Letter from the Editor

Editor Sam Aquillano reflects on 2020 in Issue 017. 

Architecture of school

By Sam Aquillano

This year is one for the history books; 2020 was not only defined by a global pandemic, but also national uprisings and conversations calling for civil rights for the Black community, and a contested presidential election. While CoDesign Collaborative is not immune to the effects of these uncertain times, we have found ways to adapt and thrive. This year we changed our name to CoDesign Collaborative—to be the museum that comes to you, wherever you are—and in doing so we’ve become a truly multimedia and global museum. 

Elizabeth Lowrey, one of our members on the Board of Directors, recently called me to say, “I don’t know how you all are doing this, but for every challenge in our world, CoDesign Collaborative has some piece of content, or exhibition, or program addressing it and helping folks understand and see how design plays a role.” That really touched me—I’m so proud of the work we do. 

One of our most notable accomplishments of the year was creating an online version of We Design: People. Practice. Progress., featuring the career stories of people from historically underinvested communities who are working across every design field. We recently added 15 designers to the online exhibition, and we’ll continue to grow the group in 2021. We also researched and curated a list of over 100 anti-racism resources, spanning self-education books, podcasts, organizations to follow, and more. And, in response to growing demands to end police violence against Black individuals, we’ve partnered with a guest editor, Jennifer Rittner, to develop a special issue of Design Museum Magazine to explore the relationship and role of design in policing. This issue will be published one year after the murder of George Floyd. 

We also shared a number of conversations focused on democracy in recent episodes of our weekly podcast, Design is Everywhere. We discussed the design of voting, political activism, and civic design. I interviewed Dana Chisnell, Director of Project ReDesign at the National Conference on Citizenship, and Anne Petersen, Director of Experience Design at 18F, a design office within the federal government, just to name a few. 

COVID-19 has completely upended our education system. To respond, our Director of Learning and Interpretation, Diana Navarrete-Rackauckas, is breaking new ground in youth design education. We brought our youth programs online in innovative ways, including sending teens design kits to use on their virtual projects. We will welcome another cohort of teens to our Neighborhood Design Project in Spring 2021. There’s also our Design Together program, a collection of design activities for all learners and classrooms, available for free on our website. 

Lastly, we’ve focused significantly on healthcare—the subject of this special, year-end issue of Design Museum Magazine, and a topic that connects to all our lives, especially this year. In this issue, we’ve partnered with thought leaders across the healthcare design ecosystem. You’ll explore how designers are making a real impact in people’s well-being through human-centered healthcare. 

I hope you learn from and enjoy this issue, and all that CoDesign Collaborative has to offer, as we explore the concerns of our time through the lens of creative problem solving. It’s our supporters who make this work possible. For those of you who can, I hope you’ll consider continuing your support and making a year-end, tax-deductible donation to the CoDesign Collaborative. To help us continue this important work into 2021, visit our website at designmuseumeverywhere.org and click “Make a year-end donation” at the top of the page. Thank you!

 

Sam Aquillano

Executive and Creative Director

CoDesign Collaborative

Cover of the Education Issue

From Design Museum Magazine Issue 017

The post Letter from the Editor appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>
Developing an Outdoor Voice https://codesigncollaborative.org/developing-an-outdoor-voice/ Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:07:59 +0000 https://codesignforstg.wpenginepowered.com/?p=16094 The post Developing an Outdoor Voice appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>

Developing an Outdoor Voice

Shaping the Perception of Land Conservation

The Trustees, an organization that set the precedent for private land conservation in the U.S., rebranded with an expanded idea of how and why we engage with nature.

Images Courtesy of The Trustees

By Mark Minelli and Nancy Jenner

In the age of social media overload and competition for awareness and loyalty, a strong brand can make the difference between a struggling organization and a thriving one. As a species, humans have evolved to be self-aware, challenging the world and shaping our experiences to our liking. Because we are intentional and aware, one might assume that we make decisions using a process that is linear and analytical. In fact, we are hardwired to do the opposite. We respond quickly and subconsciously and, even when we engage in rational thinking, past experiences and emotions influence our decisions. Consumers respond to and make decisions about brands influenced by or, perhaps more accurately, ruled by these systems of thinking. Our role as brand strategists and designers is to understand how these systems shape perception and behavior and how best to articulate our clients’ unique attributes in ways that are authentic, true, and tap into consumers’ emotions.

Informed by this understanding of perception and behavior, and employing the discipline of branding, we helped The Trustees, a New England land-conservation institution, leverage their strengths and reimagine what it means to engage in the 21st century.

First, a bit of history

At the end of the 19th century, available land in the dense urban regions along the East Coast was being quickly divided for farming, housing, and manufacturing. Boston was the fourth largest manufacturing center in the country, with hundreds of manufacturing plants consuming countryside and river fronts. While federal programs were growing to protect large areas of wilderness in the West, little was being done to conserve open space near urban centers, including Boston.

In 1891, Trustees of Reservations (now The Trustees), an organization dedicated to preserving natural and historic places in Massachusetts, established a legal entity – the first of its kind in the country – that became the model for conserving private land worldwide. The original legislation created a non-profit corporation “for the purposes of acquiring, holding, maintaining and opening to the public beautiful and historic places within the Commonwealth.” The intent was to set aside land and other natural and historic assets for public use and enjoyment.

The city of Boston was a leader in providing public access to resources once reserved for the wealthy elite. The city established the first public library in the country and one of the first art museums. In the same way the public gained access to books in libraries and art in museums, The Trustees was established to provide access to nature for all citizens. It was a radical idea.

Fast forward over one hundred years. As many land conservation organizations celebrate more than a century of operation, awareness of climate change is escalating. Air, land and water protection is becoming increasingly political, and social media has changed how we communicate. Issues of economic and social equity have become central to mission-driven organizations and shifts in funding and behavior among generations are impacting attendance and fundraising.

As the public’s awareness of changes in natural ecosystems rises and conservation organizations become more vocal, the critical task of reaching new and current audiences is both easier and more challenging. It is easier because of relatively inexpensive digital media with the potential for “viral” outreach and challenging because of competition for attention in our media-saturated society.

To address significant social and economic equity issues, land conservation organizations are learning that brand is more than signs and websites. Simply creating a sanctuary, installing a sign and expecting people to come is not likely to succeed. The Trustees had gained recognition as a leader in education initiatives, family programs, and public engagement in ways that help bridge geographic and demographic gaps, but finding the best ways to effectively communicate to targeted audiences remained elusive.

Challenges and Opportunities for The Trustees

Some of The Trustees’ challenges – specifically, deepening relationships with existing audiences and reaching and engaging new, younger audiences – are shared with most arts, culture, and environmental organizations in today’s rapidly changing world. Unique to The Trustees, however, is that the organization is actively expanding its reach into urban environments and establishing new partnerships, specifically in downtown Boston.

To mitigate the challenges and establish strong support and engagement for new opportunities, The Trustees needed to think strategically about how they were perceived and how best to engage. Minelli began working with The Trustees in the early 2000s, helping to set the foundation for their brand and engagement strategy. As they established their vision with a new strategic plan and new leadership, Minelli led a comprehensive brand update and designed an iconic new identity.

Tackling the shared challenges and unique opportunities with The Trustees involved learning how individuals respond to The Trustees properties and uncovering the underlying motivations and often subconscious responses to nature and the idea of conservation. One of the critical things we came to understand was that preserving properties and enjoying properties were often perceived as mutually exclusive endeavors.

Words and Pictures Tell the Story

Land conservation organizations, similar to other organizations that possess deep technical expertise, often use vocabulary that does not communicate effectively to the broader public. Conservation scientists and lawyers communicate using specialized professional terms that hold rich meaning in their peer networks but may not resonate more broadly. Language tends to focus primarily on technical details of ecology and species protection and less on the emotional connection to nature that resonates more deeply with the general public. Because they are focused on managing the properties, land conservation experts use rational, scientific, and legal terms to articulate why land conservation is important.

The Trustees’ founding mission centered on preserving unique places for public use and enjoyment, not on conservation for its own sake. However, as the organization evolved, communication became focused on the importance of keeping land from being developed and less on how people engage with The Trustees properties. The conservation angle worked for making the case that the land should be preserved and why people should support the organization, but the strategy wasn’t attracting visitors to the properties, especially the younger and more diverse audiences critical for continued success.

With no shortage of beautiful properties, the images The Trustees used to promote the organization were often stunningly beautiful. But, for many people, a photograph of a beautiful landscape and the words ‘land conservation’ imply that the land is being protected from people and is not for the public to use. This disconnect not only existed with the public, but also with The Trustees’ staff, who intuitively associated the organization’s focus on conservation with restricted use. Signs and staff were quick to list restrictions and slow to welcome visitors and urge them to explore and unwind. Access to properties was tolerated, not celebrated.

While The Trustees didn’t have to struggle to connect with the people who care deeply about the same things they do, they wanted to extend the opportunity to everyone, including people who had no established connection to nature. People who had little or no experience or memories of spending time in nature or had never been to a forest or beach didn’t understand how to experience The Trustees properties or why they should spend their precious free time visiting them. The organization needed a new vocabulary to engage this important demographic.

Disconnect for The Trustees

Using a variety of engagement tools with stakeholders and visitors, stakeholders and visitors, some of which shortcut rational thinking to access rapid, intuitive, “gut” reactions, we discovered a host of strong, visceral and emotional reasons why The Trustees’ properties mattered. People talked about the smell of the grass, the warmth of the sun and the sound of the ocean. They described the joy and freedom they felt disconnected from their jobs and the relentless demands of their technology devices, and talked about spending time with family and friends, as well as the renewed sense of health and clarity gained after a day outside. Rich in color, memory and intimacy, these emotional connections to the land became the basis of the brand and the stories used to frame future engagement.

Building on the evocative and emotional memories uncovered in the research, the brand strategy focused on how connection to nature enhances the human spirit in ways great and small. The goal was to build a brand that triggers personal experiences that are part of individuals’ memories and identities, not just their interests. While not everyone has an established relationship to nature, there aren’t many who don’t relate to the need to escape the daily grind or spend time with family and friends.

Designing the Brand Toolkit

Humans respond to stories and emotional triggers quickly and personally. As Brené Brown reminds us, “stories are data with a soul.” We knew that if we could tap into individuals’ emotional connection to nature and desire to escape and spend time with loved ones, the brand would resonate in new and inspiring ways, powering the organization as it worked toward its ambitious goals.

Brand messaging switched the focus from details about the properties and organization to focus on the experience of the visitor. The new branded materials invited the public to ‘find magic in the moment’ and ‘chat live with nature.’, making The Trustees the place ‘where wonder happens and spirits soar’. Photography assets were expanded to include more photos of people, details and close shots, complementing the existing glam shots of the properties. These evocative images celebrate the more sensual experiences that happen when engaging with Trustees’ properties – smells, textures, temperatures, tastes, and sounds as well as the visual beauty of the properties.

Trustees of Reservations, like many esteemed New England organizations, has a long history, and changing the name would be disruptive to the rich character of the organization, but the shorthand “trustees” of the new identity is easier to remember and allows for bolder applications which, in turn, have more impact.

The previous logo was horizontal, detailed and literal, unable to convey the breadth and diversity of the programs or properties. The new mark is stripped to its most minimal element. The lowercase “t” retains a connection to the typeface of the old identity while being reimagined to incorporate the leaf form. It is simultaneously bolder and friendlier, and the more compact form is easily applied to signage, print and social media.

If you are attempting to create recognizable branded signs at more than 100 properties in an area of the country that is primarily woodlands, having forest green signage (which the organization previously did) is not very effective. Nature is not just green. The new palette, a tapestry of rich colors, is drawn from the full range of hues found in the seasons of New England.

The new brand also had powerful implications for modifying internal culture. Brand training helped staff shift their understanding of their role from that of security guard to concierge, moving from warding off intruders to extending an experience of shared purpose and welcome. Focusing the brand on the human/enjoyment side of the mission made it easier to include the urban projects in The Trustees materials in ways that reinforced the overarching mission of public access and enjoyment.

The strong brand strategy and evocative visual and verbal tools reflect what people care about. The open and accessible look and feel enable the full diversity of contemporary communities to see themselves reflected in the organization based on their lifestyle, self-image and values. Perhaps most importantly, people are understood as central to promise of the brand, reflecting the original intent of the organization to set aside the special places that defined the character of Massachusetts for public use and enjoyment.

Any new brand is only effective if it raises awareness and engagement. The impact of the new Trustees brand didn’t take long to resonate. Attendance is up at the properties and funding has increased through individual and family contributions as well as granting organizations that measure an organization’s success by their ability to build diverse engagement.

People and Emotion at the Center

We’ve come a long way since the first railroad crossed the western plains and our interest in, and need for, protected land has never been greater. Conservation organizations such as The Trustees play a critical role in creating and sustaining a network of open land. Building support and engagement is critical. It begins with identifying and articulating, — in voice, image, and action, — the unique and authentic brand idea at the heart of the organization. People need land, and land organizations need people.

In its most pure form, the discipline of branding responds to and enhances the critical emotional underpinnings of a company or organization’s story. A successful brand provides critical cues and framing but also has great “white space” that allows individuals to see themselves reflected in the story. By putting people in the center of The Trustees brand and using evocative and sensory colors, words and images, audiences relate to the organization intuitively and are more inclined to engage.

From Design Museum Magazine Issue 014

The post Developing an Outdoor Voice appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>
Redesigning Recycling https://codesigncollaborative.org/redesigning-recycling/ Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:16:02 +0000 http://designmuseum.wpengine.com/?p=14849 The post Redesigning Recycling appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>

Redesigning Recycling

 

Perhaps you’ve seen the waves of plastic strangling our oceans or even spotted an overflowing trash bin in your neighborhood, spewing out single-use items.

Many of us have heard the familiar saying “reduce, reuse, recycle,” but it might be so familiar that it’s lost its power and meaning.

By Beth Porter, Campaign Director at Green America and author of Reduce, Reuse, Reimagine

These jarring sights serve as reminders of systems that are designed to spawn profits through waste, systems whose ill effects go beyond what we encounter in our daily lives. Impacts occur throughout an item’s life, from the extraction of its raw materials to its production, usage, and then ultimately its discard. The rate at which a product is used before being discarded depends on a number of factors, but one central driver for this repetition is demand. Corporations demand certain materials for products while consumers demand certain products based on our needs or desires. This demand typically follows a linear line of extract, produce, consume, dispose, often into a landfill or incinerator, but the way we use materials can evolve to a method that uses resources more responsibly.

Many of us have heard the familiar saying “reduce, reuse, recycle”, but it might be so familiar that it’s lost its power and meaning. When practiced in order, this phrase is actually a fundamental shift in how we use materials and resources. Reducing comes first because it is paramount to curbing environmental impact. It allows us to inspect consumption and ask ourselves if waste can be halted before it begins. It urges companies to explore designing a product using fewer, and more sustainable, materials. It’s estimated that for every one bin of waste a household tosses out, seventy bins of waste were generated during the production of those items. The next step is reusing or repurposing items. To practice this, we can line our daily routines with reusable mugs and bags and strive to “shop our homes” to use what we already own. We can buy secondhand and join community sharing programs, public libraries, and repair goods rather than replace them. This is where creativity can flourish.

And lastly, we can recycle things we need to discard. Recycling is a more responsible discard method than linear options (burning or burying our waste) because it allows us to break down items and create new goods from the raw materials. It can reduce extraction methods like mining and deforestation, which have climate impacts and can harm local communities, especially when irresponsible methods are used. Using recycled materials also saves energy and other resources during production. The Environmental Protection Agency reports that recycling in the United States reduces 184 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions, or the equivalent of taking 39 million cars off the road. And this is achieved through our national recycling rate of 35 percent. Other nations are recycling nearly twice as much, so we’ve got lots of room to improve. There are clear benefits to recycling, but we need to be very clear about what recycling is and what it isn’t. It isn’t a magic way to erase all the impacts of the products we toss out. Recycling is a complex system with many different groups of people overlapping throughout the process of breaking down materials to build new.

If you have recycling in your area, it’s likely single-stream, where you toss all recyclables in the same bin. This method increases participation, but also increases contamination. Recyclables that are coated in food or half full of liquid are too contaminated for resale, and contamination can also damage other materials like paper that are vulnerable in a single-stream system. Contamination also includes “wishcycling”, when we put items in the bin because we hope they’re recyclable, but they may not be accepted by our local service. This could be an item that may technically be recyclable but can’t navigate the current process. For example, flimsy plastic bags can get caught in sorting machinery and shut down facilities for the entire time it takes to safely dislodge them (bags can be taken back to your grocery store and reusable bags are always best). Some sorting facilities report that multiple hours every day are spent untangling items that have snaked around equipment. This creates huge, costly inefficiencies and can even add emissions when materials have to be rerouted to another disposal site because they can’t be recycled.

When recycling is presented as a magic bin that can scoop up any range of complex products and produce quality, marketable raw materials, it’s no surprise that people start putting in anything they discard. Single-stream may take in more items, but it doesn’t churn out the same amount of materials that are actually recycled. It’s estimated that 25% of our recycling stream is contaminated. This is a big problem.

There have been a few headlines this year that have suggested recycling is in crisis. This particular alarm has been sparked by China’s National Sword policy which went into effect in 2018, banning 24 material types & requiring a limit of 0.5% contamination on recyclables. For decades, U.S. companies have relied too heavily on companies in China to purchase over a quarter of our recyclables, including our poor quality ones. In the aftermath of this policy, many companies have scrambled to find buyers in other nations, but there has been massive pushback from countries who have returned thousands of tons of plastic waste back to North America. The Basel Convention, which controls the flow of hazardous waste between countries, has even added plastic waste to its list of focus areas, barring overseas sale without permission from the destination country’s government. This shift has caused a huge disruption, but as disruptions tend to do, also presented valuable opportunities. There is now a catalyst driving us to inspect the broken parts of this system so it can better serve larger goals of preventing resource waste and pollution. It’s a daunting process, but it’s also one that is far more in line with the 3 Rs. Let’s not trash recycling – instead, let’s repair it.

Articles citing recycling’s demise do tap into an important truth about recycling: it isn’t exactly working as it should. But this does not mean that recycling can’t work. There is now an opportunity to redesign the recycling system, drive down the use of landfills and incinerators, and manage materials more responsibly. However, redesigning a multi-stakeholder system requires collective engagement. Decisions made at one point have rippling effects that can swell into a monsoon of challenges for other points of the system. Stakeholder groups include government workers, waste haulers, sorting facilities, policy makers, manufacturers, corporate brands, product designers, sales representatives, and more.

Collaboration and accountability are critical to building a better system, but there is a key stakeholder group whose perspective is needed. Individual consumers have been removed from the recycling conversation in many ways, but we are necessary for its function. Yet, many of us don’t understand how recycling works (some have even deemed it more confusing than taxes or the stock market).

We weren’t always so partitioned from the process. After all, it was a series of individuals who organized their own collection drop-off sites for recyclables in neighborhoods, showing governments a demand for recycling services in the 1980s and 90s. It’s also individuals who have urged companies to make goods with recycled materials to close the loop. However, a lack of emphasis on education in many areas and the adoption of single-stream recycling has designed us away from having to think about it. Recycling needs to be accessible for wide participation from all community members. The push to remove any thought from the process has not served us well. A design for waste to be “out of sight, out of mind” lacks incentive to reduce our consumption or question where our discards are delivered.

Research shows that certain communities have been targeted for waste disposal far more than others. In 1979, Dr. Robert Bullard led research on Houston disposal sites at Texas A&M University. Their research found five out of five city-owned landfills, six out of eight incinerators, and three out of four privately owned landfills were located in predominantly Black neighborhoods. This led to the conclusion that even though Black residents comprised 25 percent of the population during the studied time period, 82 percent of all Houston’s waste was dumped in Black neighborhoods. This environmental racism continues today, as a recent report from The New School showed that 79 percent of operating incinerators in the U.S. are located in environmental justice communities. It’s clear that these communities have been long targeted and burdened with the dangerous effects of our consumption and disposal practices.

It’s an unequivocal fact that we need to consume less, but that’s not the entire scope of the issue. When we follow the thread of our massive consumption rates, we find systems designed to make buying and discarding as ritualistic as possible. This is achieved through planned obsolescence, or developing products with a short-term and baked-in end date, and a deluge of marketing attempts to seduce us into buying things we don’t need or even want – and this thread can be traced directly back to the companies churning out products. We all have a responsibility to address waste, but we should be held accountable for matters within our sphere of influence. That influence can expand, but it requires resources and certain privileges to do so. The burden of responsibility to alleviate the harm should be heaviest on those who are causing the most negative impact.

We can use our individual power to push back against wasteful systems, but it takes collective mobilization to uproot and replace them. For example, Taiwan was once fraught with litter and pollution, but has transformed its waste system to be more sustainable and now has one of the highest recycling rates in the world. This was made possible through a multi-stakeholder approach, solid and ambitious government goals, and a transformation in how people handle their waste. The new system has clearly defined roles for each stakeholder group: residents who sort their recyclables; private companies contracted to collect waste; local government providing public collection; and a recycling fund, in which manufacturers fund municipal collection and companies compliant with environmental and social standards. The program is overseen by a board filled with representatives from governments, trade groups, environmental and consumer protection organizations, and academia. There is also a mandatory take-back program in which retailers must provide collection of appliances for responsible disposal. The program uses social norms to make recycling more of a public event, centered around a musical waste truck that collects refuse directly from residents multiple times a day. It collects 13 material types, and the recycling, trash, and compost are all source-separated by residents, with workers available to assist. Taiwan is seeing impressive returns on these changes, which signals the benefits of resident involvement in a process that is accessible for all.

The solutions developed in other countries offer learnings for redesigning recycling in the U.S. Thriving systems require that expectations and roles be clearly communicated. They need to be accessible, transparent, equitable, and serve a circular process. They should have metrics to show progress and track the decline of new resource extraction. They hold the beneficial aspects of the current system, while deepening those strengths and mending the deteriorated parts with threads of new ideas to fit the modern era. Designing a recycling system to meet all these needs is a significant undertaking but can yield powerful and positive impacts. It cannot be achieved by one stakeholder group, although we all have a role in making recycling work as it could. There are three channels that individuals can use to manifest this change.

From Design Museum Magazine Issue 014

Want to learn more from Beth Porter?

Listen to Beth on Jonathan Van Ness’s Getting Curious!

Civic Engagement

Waste issues are inextricably political. Our waste management programs are often managed by local government programs which maintain contracts with waste companies, provide outreach to residents, and work to address waste in residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. The waste we generate has to go somewhere, and the choices we have are typically recycling and (increasingly) compost or landfills and incinerators. We can act through civic engagement to ensure that sustainable, equitable practices are reflected throughout our waste system. We can leverage our role as constituents to urge for national movement along with local change.

Research environmental justice efforts to find groups that you can support. There are many communities fighting landfill and incineration expansion and pushing for solutions. Search for websites, social media groups, or community forums that are discussing these issues to find the best paths to volunteer or donate.

Many government workers are trying to meet varied demands to handle waste. Check your local government’s website to learn about goals to reduce waste and improve recycling and compost services. If you don’t see any publicly, you can send an email to find out what their current priorities are and the best ways for you to get involved.

Visit TownHallProject.com to find political events in your district. If you’re able to attend, inquire the candidates or elected officials’ sustainability platform. Ask how they plan to take action on waste issues, perhaps through their own legislation or through the Congressional Recycling Caucuses or the Environmental Protection Agency.

Home & Community

For many of us, this is where our waste practices take root. Our homes are often where we begin analyzing our consumption and making changes before taking those learnings out to our community. Powerful change can be sparked by people coming together to reduce, reuse, and recycle. Residents have created drop off points for recycling in areas without adequate services. Neighbors have nurtured systems to shift consumption habits through repair services, tool-sharing, clothing swaps, community gardens, and public libraries. By enhancing our interactions with others around waste issues, we can make positive change while forging stronger bonds and sharing ideas.

Consider the people beyond the bin and use the service responsibly. When we place incorrect items in the bin, we cause costly interruptions to the efficiency of sorting our recyclables. The recycling bin isn’t a second trash can, and the outcomes of those streams are very different.

We need to think of the workers who collect, sort, and process our waste. Waste hauling is the fifth most dangerous job in the nation, and we can support workers by navigating their trucks with extreme caution, extending gratitude for their work, and urging legislators to support initiatives increasing worker safety.

To start reducing, peek in your trash and see what you’re throwing out. Then begin to explore alternatives that generate less waste. This can be a creative and exciting learning process, and there are countless do-it-yourself tips and zero-waste practices online to inspire you.

Become a recycling champion for your home, workplace, or social circles. This means knowing your local guidelines and sharing the information by putting up a poster near your recycling bins or using other communication channels like social media or neighborhood forums. And if your local material recovery facility offers tours, you can organize a group to go see how recyclables are sorted.

Consumer Demand

Recycling is inevitably tied to markets. To reduce the extraction of virgin materials, we need to shift the demand to recycled materials (as well as scale back overall consumption). And it’s essential that accountability be placed where a great deal of it belongs – onto companies. As individuals, we can make sustainable choices if they are accessible to us, which can look different based on the issue and any privileges required to access. If we’re at a store and there are no sustainable options, there’s a ceiling to what we can do in that moment when we need to make a purchase. This is why we need to express demand through a variety of ways.

When going to make a purchase, we can first ask ourselves if it’s something that we need. If the answer is yes, try to buy from businesses that practice real sustainability. We can look for specifics on the company website (i.e., what are the actual materials being used?) and see if they are committed to practices that are good for people and the planet. Look for versions of your product made with recycled content in-store or online before buying. Search resources like GreenPages.org to learn about responsible companies.

Recyclable packaging does not necessarily equal a sustainable product that’s made with fair labor and just practices. Redesigning our systems means environmental and social responsibility throughout supply chains, not just in the wrapping. Ask companies to explain how their product is sustainably-made through social media or direct email. Tag companies that you want to do better in social media posts and ask friends to take part.

As individuals, we can do our best to make responsible choices and engage with systems like recycling correctly. But it’s not on us to figure out the details of how a company we don’t work for should improve practices. Support initiatives and policies that drive companies to redesign their own products to work within a more circular system.

No one has all the answers to redesigning recycling and there is not one single solution that will fix its challenges. The need for a range of people to contribute their ideas and perspectives is what makes a complex system more enriched and resilient. And so, if recycling is to be a more effective part of the solution to tackle waste, the time is now and we can all fill a powerful role in its redesign.

The post Redesigning Recycling appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>
Post-Sprint Recovery https://codesigncollaborative.org/post-sprint-recovery/ Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:39:17 +0000 https://codesignforstg.wpenginepowered.com/?p=17080 The post Post-Sprint Recovery appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>

Post-Sprint Recovery

In your typical design-thinking workshop, an organization gathers bright minds from design-adjacent fields to tackle complex problems.

The Continuity Canvas is a tool for continuing work and checking in after design sprints

By Marcelino Alvarez, Chief Product Officer, Fresh Consulting

Over days or hours, hundreds of Post-Its are sacrificed, ideas are generated, business plans proposed, prototypes created, and, occasionally, concepts are even validated with potential users. A few weeks later, many of those ideas are forgotten, stymied by a lack of momentum or a clear next step.

This is an epidemic on a grand scale. Hundreds of thousands of hours spent brainstorming and planning are wasted, and countless frustrated individuals wind up disillusioned, dissuaded from participating in another event. The sunk cost of those resource hours is probably equivalent to the GDP of a small nation. Big dreams get rusty fast.

Taking Our Own Medicine

Fresh is an integrated consulting team of designers, developers, and engineers that builds fresh experiences people love. Powered by our design-led innovation process we deliver end-to-end experiences to help businesses grow. Fresh acquired Uncorked Studios in November 2019. Our employees are accustomed to working cross-functionally on high-level system design, as well as graphic, visual, and interaction design.

That being said, we still occasionally fall down when it comes to taking the momentum from a focused block of collaboration time and translating it into heads-down work. But why, we asked, is it a challenge to create this sort of continuity?

We started with the tools. After all, according to John M Culkin, a media scholar, “We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us.” Design-thinking tools are hyper tuned to the workshop format. Consultancies and design firms promote the power of Post-Its and Sharpies. But when it comes to translating to individual tasks, this is an outdated way of working. The intent behind these tools is to promote velocity, but we already live in an acceleration-obsessed society. Without continuous support after the initial adrenaline rush, ideas fade as fast as they arrived.

A Cure for Early Stage Idea Asphyxiation

Workshops beget design sprints, which beget prototypes, which beget proofs-of-concept. But then what? If it takes a project several weeks to go from one phase to the next, the momentum is gone.

There are few tools that connect these phases, and even fewer helping their output make use of the power the ultimate user community can provide: everything from user validation to customer testing to mentorship to advocacy to funding. As our collective efforts mutate into “what’s next?”, we’ve designed a tool we think can help identify how to continue beyond the workshop. It’s designed to encourage idea holders to solidify their concept’s audience, stakeholders, and beneficiaries and better understand how they can maintain the momentum.

We believe this tool can help the top ideas emerging from these events to find a potential home, further validate their hypotheses, or connect people working on the project to individuals and organizations who have already been thinking about a particular problem and its possible solutions. In addition, we believe this tool can increase the likelihood of success for fledgling ideas, and improve the odds for those seeking to generate traction and create meaningful change. We’re calling it the Continuity Canvas, and we’d be honored if you’d take it for a spin.

Use As Directed

Start in the center with the Problem Statement. What’s the problem your team is trying to solve? This might be the prompt from the workshop or hackathon, or it might be the business problem your group is tasked with solving.

Next up is the Product Concept. Describe the product or business solution you are proposing. Is it a platform, a mobile app, or a service? What does it allow its users to accomplish? How does it address the problem statement? Why Now? What is unique about this moment in time? (This was inspired by an excellent blog post titled “It’s okay that your startup doesn’t have a communications strategy” by Ashley Mayer from Social Capital). Is it a new technology that has made it easier to solve a previously unsolvable problem? Is it a shift in public policy or a regulation? How Do We Know We’ve Solved It? This is what we’re working towards. How do you measure it along the way?

Next, move towards the left-hand column. Whose Needs are Being Met by this problem? For example, is it a consumer, an age group, or an under-represented portion of the population? Who is Mutually Benefiting? This might be a source of potential sponsors, advocates, or subject matter experts. Who is Paying? Note that it might be the same or different from the two questions above. How Are We Making Money? Describe the business model. Is it a non-profit, a service model, or a product that you sell? Are you applying for grants? Raising money? Bootstrapping?

Next, move on to the right-hand column. Who are potential Mentors for this product? Think of people who have looked at this problem statement before. They could come from a variety of sectors, from the public to the private. Focus the initial search within your community. Who are people that might offer insight or other connections over a cup of coffee?

Some individuals have been blessed with a combination of a great network and a sense of altruism and purpose behind making sure that all the nodes are connected. These are Connectors, and they are vital components of a healthy startup ecosystem. These individuals might not be able to help with the immediate needs you have, but they likely know someone who might. Give them a hat tip and pay it forward. Be willing to make an intro or take a coffee with someone someday.

Advocates are a more focused, high-touch form of a connector. They might be able to unlock a powerful ally by not just making the intro, but also by vouching for you and your team, or maybe even by taking part in some of the conversations. They might be a subject matter expert in the area your idea is focused in, or someone who is generally interested in advocating for folks who are just getting started out. They might one day make a great member of your board.

Tools help you maintain traction. How will you stay in touch? Will you set up a new Slack account or use your own? How often will you communicate? Weekly stand-ups via Hangouts? Many ideas fail to gain traction after an event because there’s no agreed-upon way to stay in touch.

We’ve borrowed from the idea of tear-away posters on telephone poles and in coffee shops to help guide your conversations with folks you meet along the way. The intent is that the top portion stays relatively the same, but that you customize the bottom part into two pieces for people who help provide continuity: Your ask to the helper, formulated as a Call-to-Action. And a counter-signed piece, which they’ll take with them, What Am I Doing? This is designed to be a soft commitment to how that individual will help out, from mentoring to connecting to advocating for your concept.

Canvas in Action: Some Side Effects

Late last year, the Tech Association of Oregon (TAO) was looking to advise its members on innovative business models. What new approaches to structuring our businesses were out there? What were the pros and cons of each? Who might be able to build a more structured approach to not just the TAO’s own organization, but its members’ organizations? The topic was large and had many potential discussion areas where the group could get waylaid and energy could wane.

The Continuity Canvas was a great tool to keep our working group focused on the problem. After an introductory session, we filled out the canvas. The group was able to clear up roles and responsibilities over a series of asynchronous work sessions and subsequent conference calls and then presented it back to the organization. Insights from the canvas helped inform House Bill 2395, an IoT Security Law passed by Oregon in the summer of 2019.

As designers and people who love making things, we’re eternally optimistic, and dive into the novelty of a problem with full enthusiasm. But we know not all concepts born at a hackathon are destined to become a product, or a company worthy of investment. The experience of participating is often a motivator enough. But as more and more organizations rely on the workshop and the hackathon as a proxy (or starting point) for innovation, the Continuity Canvas might help maintain momentum beyond the initial surge of shared creative adrenaline.

The Continuity Canvas helps maintain momentum on concepts by encouraging community validation and insight.

From Design Museum Magazine Issue 014

The Prescription: Early Precursors

We designed the canvas to integrate with our favorite, most effective design thinking tools, but it also works by itself. If you’re using this as part of a longer workshop or engagement, certain activities function well as precursors to the Continuity Canvas. Shout out to their various creators: thank you.

Who Do

A game to identify stakeholders and clarify goals. You can find out how to play here.

Empathy Map

Designed by XPLANE, the updated empathy map is a framework to practice developing empathy. Download the updated worksheet here.

Journey Map

Journey maps visually represent a person’s experience with what you’re creating. Find a full how-to guide here.

Business Model Canvas

This tool allows you to describe, challenge, invent, and pivot your business model. Check it out here.

Product Canvas

A simple tool to create positive user experiences with the right features, combining agile and UX techniques. See some examples.

The post Post-Sprint Recovery appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>
Bringing the Maker Movement Home https://codesigncollaborative.org/bringing-the-maker-movement-home/ Thu, 02 Jan 2020 16:42:53 +0000 https://codesignforstg.wpenginepowered.com/?p=17104 The post Bringing the Maker Movement Home appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>

Bringing the Maker Movement Home

Nestor Castaneda starts 3D Lab in El Salvador

Nestor Castaneda is an engineer, designer, entrepreneur, and mentor whose work includes materials research at Drexel University and composite engineering at flying car manufacturer Terrafugia.

Nestor’s mentors opened doors for his education and career. Becoming a mentor himself, Nestor guides the next generation of makers and designers in El Salvador

Interviewed by Eva Hill, photos courtesy of Nestor Castaneda

In a recent interview with CoDesign, Nestor told us about one of his newest projects: bringing the maker movement to his home country of El Salvador.

Eva Hill: Could you give a brief background on how you got into design and why you find it interesting?

Nestor Castaneda: My first step into design was through art. I guess I had that part of my brain that liked art, and I also had the part of my brain that liked math and science – like a left brain, right brain situation. Towards graduation, I leaned more towards math and science, so that’s how I got into engineering, and within engineering the aspect that I liked most was design, because you get to add value to a problem with your creativity and with the knowledge that you might have.

EH: What was your inspiration for creating the makerspace project, 3DLAB?

NC: Towards the last years of my college experience, I started thinking that I would like to go back home and have my own engineering company. If I go back home to El Salvador and I set up my engineering company, I don’t want to hire people from outside the country. I want to hire local people so we provide employment. As of now, El Salvador is not known as a technological hub. I want to change that.

I realized that I needed to invest in education. One way I could do it is through workshops – whenever I’m [in El Salvador] I could host my own courses – informal workshops, teaching how to 3D model and how to use digital fabrication tools and things like that. At the time there wasn’t really a place I could do this, so that’s the point at which I realized I needed to create a makerspace.

I have close connections with a university back home, Universidad Tecnológica de El Salvador (UTEC) – that is, Technological University of El Salvador. When I went to the university, I happened to come across a group of students who had also been thinking about something along those lines. We immediately clicked, and that was crucial to the logistics of all this because we made a good team. When you have a really good team, you can overcome the barriers of distance.

EH: Do you see further expansion of the space in the future?

NC: Definitely. Even though we are only offering prototyping as a service and workshops, my goal for next year is to create classes that are part of the syllabus so that students can formally take classes that have been designed by us, and then once we have those courses, the next step would be to integrate existing and new careers at the university.

One of the huge milestones is not only expanding the physical space, but becoming a Fab Lab too. Fab Labs have a set of requirements, and within the requirements are a set of tools that you have to have in your makerspace. The idea behind this is that no matter where you go, whether you’re in Brazil or France or El Salvador, you can make the same things because you’re going to have the same tools. You become a member of this international community, a network of all the makerspaces that are Fab Labs. So with that, we’re positioning ourselves and the country in the international maker world. We’re going to get the word out there that things are happening in El Salvador and that we are leading this maker movement back home.

EH: What changes have you seen in the past decade or so in the way that art and design are valued in both El Salvador and the United States?

NC: [In the United States], art and design are definitely valued more now, and you know that because about 10 years ago, when you heard about education, the hot topic then was STEM education, but nowadays you’re hearing STEAM, and the “A” stands for “arts.” So the fact that we are thinking more about adding arts as a core education – I think that says a lot. And it doesn’t surprise me that we are valuing arts and design more, because with the technological progress that we’re seeing, things are just happening so fast that we have to figure out ways to preserve what makes us human, like the arts. I think something that technology will never replace is human creativity.

It’s not as drastic, but in El Salvador you are also hearing about STEAM education. There are STEAM labs, for example. However, because our technology isn’t hardcore, art has always been close to us, and I think we never lost its value. What I am seeing is more young people getting into design and the arts, and that’s because older generations are providing opportunities through workshops and fairs and things like that to promote design. So that’s exciting to see as well.

EH: Would you say that there’s an artistic component to the makerspace as well as the engineering aspects?

NC: Definitely. I don’t want the makerspace to become just an engineering lab – in fact, when I describe the makerspace, I describe it as a design laboratory. Art has a lot to do with it, because sometimes the coolest projects are not constrained by mathematical equations. I would like the involvement of the arts [there] to be more intentional. Towards this, we are working on a “maker-in-residence” program. I can see any person that’s a maker, whether their background is in industrial design or engineering or arts, coming to the lab and finding interesting ways in which they can use the fabrication tools to create stuff.

EH: Are there any other projects that you’re planning on in the future?

NC: The thing about El Salvador is that there is so much opportunity that can be hard to see. What I mean by that is that you do not see high-rises and technological factories. That’s my main drive with everything that I’m doing, to elevate the technological capacity of the country. Towards it, there are so many things that I would like to do. The first step was the makerspace. I think the next project that I’ll be working on in parallel is my own company, but not fully-fledged. For example, my dream would be to make – to fabricate in the country – an electric bike, or something like that. Something that involves software, hardware, design, but everything manufactured within the country. That’s what I would like to start working on in 10 years, when I get there, when I can live there and dedicate my full time to that.

Read more about Nestor’s story in We Design: People. Practice. Progress. on view at our Boston and Portland branches. Find the exhibition near you!

From Design Museum Magazine Issue 014

The post Bringing the Maker Movement Home appeared first on CoDesign Collaborative.

]]>